Brief History

The history of redlining is critical to understanding the economic disparities between South Greensboro and North Greensboro. Redlining refers to the discriminatory practice, starting in the 1930s, where the federal government, through the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), literally drew red lines on maps around neighborhoods deemed “risky” for mortgage lending. These neighborhoods were predominantly Black or occupied by other minority groups.
How Redlining Affected South Greensboro:
In cities across America, including Greensboro, neighborhoods that were predominantly African American or immigrant were marked in red, signaling to banks and lenders that these areas were too risky for home loans or investments. South Greensboro, home to many Black residents, was subjected to this systematic disinvestment.
Divestment: Banks, real estate developers, and the government funneled resources away from redlined areas, making it nearly impossible for Black residents to get mortgages or loans for home improvements. Without investment, homes and infrastructure in these areas deteriorated.
Lack of Development: As Black families struggled to maintain their homes without access to loans, public services such as schools, parks, and transportation were also neglected. This lack of investment further entrenched poverty in these areas.
North Greensboro and the Benefits of Investment:
In contrast, North Greensboro, which was predominantly white, was designated as “safe” or “desirable” for investment. Banks and developers were eager to offer loans and build new housing developments. As a result:
Investment: These areas saw significant investment in infrastructure, schools, and businesses. Homes were built, roads were maintained, and public services flourished.
Property Value Growth: Property values in these white neighborhoods steadily increased as demand for homes grew, generating wealth for homeowners in these areas, often passing that wealth down through generations.
Long-Lasting Effects:
The effects of redlining didn’t disappear when the practice was outlawed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968. The years of systematic neglect in South Greensboro have left a legacy of lower property values, underfunded schools, and fewer job opportunities. Meanwhile, North Greensboro continues to benefit from the historical investments that were made decades ago.
This divide between North and South Greensboro can still be seen today, with communities in the south, like Gorrell Street, continuing to struggle for the resources and opportunities that are readily available in wealthier, historically white neighborhoods.
GSO UNA’s Fight for Equity:
The GSO UNA is committed to addressing these historical injustices by advocating for the same opportunities and investments in South Greensboro that have been historically reserved for the North. By pushing for equitable development, infrastructure improvements, and community programs, GSO UNA aims to ensure that all residents, regardless of race or neighborhood, have a fair chance to thrive.